Any scholar delving in the labyrinthine traces of sacred texts should be aware of the incongruousness purported in the first two chapters of Genesis, in which the compilation of edited texts have been edited, undeniably by different pens. The Bible, without a doubt, is the most popular knowingly text in the west, so, I decided to begin investigating, since is easier to be familiarized with the passages, "collated" from the surface of most popular parables and give the reader a dispassionately dissection of the allegories and parables in Genesis, and ascertain a scientific, logical and brief editorial continuum. The problems with Genesis, as with any other sacred texts, are of chronology, continuity, translation, and what's more, of edition. In grammatical terms, for example, the Hebrews sentence structure was usually paratactic, meaning that the whole sentence was connected with the conjunction " and." Now, by the adopted form of interlacing the sentences we'll speculate that the edition of this text was done maybe a few hundred years anno dominae corresponding to this unorthodox form of uniting sentences. For example, fragments from diverse sources i.e: literal translation of Genesis 1:1-4, " in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth and the earth was formless and void and... the waters and God said, " let it be light," and there was light and..." ancient Hebrews very rarely used subordinates clauses or phrases when their sentences expressed several ideas; for instance, different forms of parallelism were used in the introductory part of Genesis and chiasm. Based on the Greek word x, describing the x literary structure where chiasm is an inverted parallel structure. The complexity of literary structure is - in it-self - proof of manipulation. The reason why it is not notable, is because the form of writing was adopted before by Indian text or combination of texts, which was slowly degenerating as time went by. When one reads the Gita vs the Bible there are great differences in terms of richness of text, more complex combination of creative grammar and no trail of adjunct verses united by multiple ideas. The transgression from one event to the other by nature brings change in its parts, that is indisputable. Same with story and same with language. For example, in Ezequiel, the arrival of the Gods in chariots of fire descending in large clouds, soundless, along with the demonic-like creatures appearing and talking to him, is taken by cultures as a way of communicating certain truth. In the Mahabharata, the incredible nuclear wars brought by the God's and also their ascend to the land threatening the earth-man for not complaying with their commands is also an event translated by their writers, also lost in allegories and other forms of rituals or spectacles.The Greeks glorified and supported events like this in their famous tragedies because we grew a costumed to ask for help needlessly when we couldn't accomplish a hard task, outside the theater. This plot devise was called " Dux Ex Machina" as a last resort to resolve a very unsolvable and complicated story ending; to put it in the words of neoclassical literary critics Corneill and J. Dennis," they are the perfect recipe for a bad play." It is supremely difficult to define a date to the number of civilization, cities, and countries that occupied the enormous latifundiums's of Southwestern Asia, Northeastern Africa, the Celtic Region, and North Africa. And to simply surrender all the question marks in substitution for the apocryphal views in Genesis and the creation of the universe in a measly, six thousand years ante christum is ridiculous. The Epic of Gilgamesh is an ancient poem from ancient Mesopotamia and is among the early known works of literary fiction about a mythological hero. There is some who believe among scholars that the story was a series of stories pre-dating the Sumerians, but unfortunately the additional tablets could not be put to cohesion. The time given by the scientist was two thousand years. It is interesting to know that the older version of the Gilgamesh poem was the only one to yield a significant translation. If we decide to check for all the chronological history of all known civilizations in the books taught in schools; we find that the chronology is calculated and it's consistent with the parameters set in the Bible and the Pentateuch. And, if, the time frame from the beginning of the old civilization had an erring difference of ten thousand years [off] by speculation perpetrated by some archeologists or historians' or any scientist', history would have to be re-written. However, any conscious and sensitive person wouldn't mind building back our history as long as is based on [true] history, not some fancy, flashy, placated rhetoric spewed by some scientist who's only interest is their self preservation and glory, for the purpose of some commercialization of history. There is absolutely no shame in fixing prior errors done by scientist in pre-history. But, since it is a generality that truth doesn't make space for profitable financial allocation and speculation base on this rare financial commodity known as truth is a gem, everybody pretends to be affiliated with, claims' it as best friend, brothers in arms, swears to die by it, and some even call themselves such, yet no one would bet a dime on it since is commercially dead - ironically, everybody would claim to have it. Truth and lies. Lies, however, is a popular commodity introduced into public offering roughly about the same time the truth was introduced but maintains the populous in a deep and stagnated trance. Politically, lies seem to work faster for its own purpose. Hitler said:" The bigger the lie the more people will believe it." That phrace imbued in the mind of a very frustrated man, accomplished so many good things for Germany at the cost of so many innocent lives. In Genesis, Elohim on Adam: " Behold, I have given you everything which is upon the face of the earth...subdue it," and " have dominion" over all. I doubted very dearly that this is a "God" teaching his son about love; as religion would want us to believe. Perhaps, the cipher for the scripture is not in the general perception indoctrinated by the hierophants but in the empirical analysis of its literary construction, the traces of their origin by means of Linguistics, Archeology, Paleontology and other sciences that can corroborate to factual information not myth, and in the careful juxtaposition of other sacred scriptures' not in the mere verisimilitude of scriptures but underneath that shadowing veil. In terms of place, objects, and man, there can be traces from the pre-cuneiform scripts of Sumeria, Chaldean, the Akkadians's progenitors and Aryan instructors of the former. It is strongly contested that the Akkad tribes of Chaldia, Babylonia, and Assyria were in any way cognate with the Brahmans, of Hindustand; but there are more proofs in favor of this opinion than otherwise. the problem or the advantage, " for others," has been that, the scintilla of evidence from the sacred scribes is not enough to fill in the missing enigma left in a long chain of these texts usurped by " divine governments and religious oligarchies." On another note, if we follow the passage of the Ta biblia la hagia Septuagint; this Greek version of the Old Testament, including the apocrypha, was made for Greek speaking Jews in Egypt, in the 3rd and 4th century. So, with these small glimpses we find hints of etymological findings imbued in the texts that serves us as a point of reference to get an accurate and systematic venue to determine an approximate period down to its origins. Lets start with the first book of the Bible, Genesis, the famous " Garden of Eden." First, the location is not myth at all. " Eden, or the Hebrew Gan-Eden, meaning the park or the Garden of Eden, is an archaic name of the country watered by the Euphrates and its many tributaries, from Asia, Armena to the Erythraian Sea. In the Chaldean Book of Numbers, its location is designated in numerals, and in the cipher Rosicrucian manuscript, left by Count St. Germain is fully described in detail. In the Assyrian tablets it is rendered as gan-dunyas. " Behold," say Elohim of Genesis, " the man is becoming as one of us" the Elohim may be accepted in one sense for Gods or powers, and taken in another one for the Aleim, or priest; the hyrophants initiated into the good and the evil of this world; for there was a college of priest called the Aliem. Instead of becoming a neophyte, and gradually obtaining his esoteric knowledge through a regular initiation, an Adam, or man, uses his faculties of intuition, and prompted by the serpent, woman and Matter, tastes of the tree of knowledge the esoteric or secret doctrine unlawfully. The priest of Hercules, or melkarth, the " Lord " of Eden, all wore coats of skin." The Text says: " And Java Aleim, made for Adam and his wife "Chitonuth." The first Hebrew word, chitun, is the Greek, chiton. It becomes Slavonic word by adoption from the Bible, and means coat, an upper garment. Though containing the same substratum of esoteric truth as every early cosmogony, the Hebrew Scripture wears on its face the marks of its double origin. Its Genesis is purely reminiscence of the Babylonian captivity.
In conclusion, to have an accurate view of events as detailed as the demands and rigor that the scientific community expects, is unrealistic. And realistically, never have been met! One cannot progress on such choke-hold, submit to so much unnatural requirements and expect oxygen to come out. To admit to a set of scientific rules made of political and moral laws, is an obstacle in the growth of science and jeopardizes the future of new technology. The road of science, more and more, if no solution is attained in the community, will make science more irrational and unadaptable to newer and faster discoveries. For example, the ongoing problem with the politics of archeology. In this case lets talk about the accuracy of [time], the age of the Sphix in Giza has been a topic of debate for decades. All rooted because the date on the Bible happens to match the date scientists found through radioisotope carbon - 14. There are many reason why carbon dating is inaccurate that I can mention here but is long and complicated, the main reason is that, for carbon-14 dating to be accurate, the concentrations of carbon-14 and carbon-12 must have remained constant in the atmosphere and that is an impossibility. Nonetheless, the Egyptians according by the glyphs found in the pyramids on Giza and given all the data gathered, and according to the possition of the stars, their time seems that it is correct. They time it thirty eight thousand years ante christum. Also, given new erosion test by john Antony West and his team of scientists whom corroborated aproximately to the date calculated from the walls in the pyramids. And lets face it, Egypt is the first semblance of a super advance civilization and no matter how hard it is for us to admitted, their technology in every sense of the word was greatly superior and way far in advance than ours. My question is, giving the inacuracies and gaps from antiquity, in its timely chronoly certified by our so called archeologists, what is to stop different factions of scientific groups, scholastic communities, and other NPOs to fill in the immense gaps left by history and close the windows of truth in the name of interest and power?
Unfortunately, in this case, the handle of power does not lie in the hand of truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment