Saturday, February 28, 2009

Traces of Origin in Philological Sacred Text


Any scholar delving in the labyrinthine traces of sacred texts should be aware of the incongruousness purported in the first two chapters of Genesis, in which the compilation of edited texts have been edited, undeniably by different pens. The Bible, without a doubt, is the most popular knowingly text in the west, so, I decided to begin investigating, since is easier to be  familiarized with the passages, "collated" from the surface of most popular parables  and give the reader a dispassionately dissection of the allegories and parables in Genesis, and ascertain a scientific, logical and brief editorial continuum. The problems with Genesis, as with any other sacred texts, are of chronology, continuity, translation, and what's more, of edition. In grammatical terms, for example, the Hebrews sentence structure was usually paratactic, meaning that the whole sentence was connected with the conjunction " and." Now, by the adopted form of interlacing the sentences we'll speculate that the edition of this text was done maybe a few hundred years anno dominae corresponding to this unorthodox form of uniting sentences. For example, fragments from diverse sources i.e: literal translation of Genesis 1:1-4, " in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth and the earth was formless and void and... the waters and God said, " let it be light," and there was light and..." ancient Hebrews very rarely used subordinates clauses or phrases when their sentences expressed several ideas; for instance, different forms of parallelism were used in the introductory part of Genesis and chiasm. Based on the Greek word x, describing the x literary structure where chiasm is an inverted parallel structure. The complexity of literary structure is - in it-self - proof of manipulation. The reason why it is not notable, is because the form of writing was adopted before by Indian text or combination of texts, which was slowly degenerating as time went by. When one reads the Gita vs the Bible there are great differences in terms of richness of text, more complex combination of creative grammar and no trail of adjunct verses united by multiple ideas. The transgression from one event to the other by nature brings change in its parts, that is indisputable. Same with story and same with language. For example, in Ezequiel, the arrival of the Gods in chariots of fire descending in large clouds, soundless, along with the demonic-like creatures appearing and talking to him, is taken by cultures as a way of communicating certain truth. In the Mahabharata, the incredible nuclear wars brought by the God's and also their ascend to the land threatening the earth-man for not complaying with their commands is also an event translated by their writers, also lost in allegories and other forms of rituals or spectacles.The Greeks glorified and supported events like this in their famous tragedies because we grew a costumed to ask for help needlessly when we couldn't accomplish a hard task, outside the theater. This plot devise was called " Dux Ex Machina" as a last resort to resolve a very unsolvable and complicated story ending; to put it in the words of neoclassical literary critics Corneill and J. Dennis," they are the perfect recipe for a bad play." It is supremely difficult to define a date to the number of civilization, cities, and countries that occupied the enormous latifundiums's of Southwestern Asia, Northeastern Africa, the Celtic Region, and North Africa. And to simply surrender all the question marks in substitution for the apocryphal views in Genesis and the creation of the universe in a measly, six thousand years ante christum is ridiculous. The Epic of Gilgamesh is an ancient poem from ancient Mesopotamia and is among the early known works of literary fiction about a mythological hero. There is some who believe among scholars that the story was a series of stories pre-dating the Sumerians, but unfortunately the additional tablets could not be put to cohesion. The time given by the scientist was two thousand years. It is interesting to know that the older version of the Gilgamesh poem was the only one to yield a significant translation. If we decide to check for all  the chronological history of all known civilizations in the books taught in schools; we find that the chronology is calculated and it's consistent with the parameters set in the Bible and the Pentateuch. And, if, the time frame from the beginning of the old civilization had an erring difference of ten thousand years [off] by speculation perpetrated by some archeologists or historians' or any scientist', history would have to be re-written. However, any conscious and sensitive person wouldn't mind building back our history as long as is based on [true] history, not some fancy, flashy, placated rhetoric spewed by some scientist who's only interest is their self preservation and glory, for the purpose of some commercialization of history. There is absolutely no shame in fixing prior errors done by scientist in pre-history. But, since it is a generality that truth doesn't make space for profitable financial allocation and speculation base on this rare financial commodity known as truth is a gem, everybody pretends to be affiliated with, claims' it as best friend, brothers in arms, swears to die by it, and some even call themselves such, yet no one would bet a dime on it since is commercially dead - ironically, everybody would claim to have it. Truth and lies. Lies, however, is a popular commodity introduced into public offering roughly about the same time the truth was introduced but maintains the populous in a deep and stagnated trance. Politically, lies seem to work faster for its own purpose. Hitler said:" The bigger the lie the more people will believe it." That phrace imbued in the mind of a very frustrated man, accomplished so many good things for Germany at the cost of so many innocent lives. In Genesis, Elohim on Adam: " Behold, I have given you everything which is upon the face of the earth...subdue it," and " have dominion" over all. I doubted very dearly that this is a "God" teaching his son about love; as religion would want us to believe. Perhaps, the cipher for the scripture is not in the general perception indoctrinated by the hierophants but in the empirical analysis of its literary construction, the traces of their origin by means of Linguistics, Archeology, Paleontology and other sciences that can corroborate to factual information not myth, and in the careful juxtaposition of other sacred scriptures' not in the mere verisimilitude of scriptures but underneath that shadowing veil. In terms of place, objects, and man, there can be traces from the pre-cuneiform scripts of Sumeria, Chaldean, the Akkadians's progenitors and Aryan instructors of the former. It is strongly contested that the Akkad tribes of Chaldia, Babylonia, and Assyria were in any way cognate with the Brahmans, of Hindustand; but there are more proofs in favor of this opinion than otherwise. the problem or the advantage, " for others," has been that, the scintilla of evidence from the sacred scribes is not enough to fill in the missing enigma left in a long chain of these texts usurped by " divine governments and religious oligarchies." On another note, if we follow the passage of the Ta biblia la hagia Septuagint; this Greek version of the Old Testament, including the apocrypha, was made for Greek speaking Jews in Egypt, in the 3rd and 4th century. So, with these small glimpses we find hints of etymological findings imbued in the texts that serves us as a point of reference to get an accurate and systematic venue to determine an approximate period down to its origins. Lets start with the first book of the Bible, Genesis, the famous " Garden of Eden." First, the location is not myth at all. " Eden, or the Hebrew Gan-Eden, meaning the park or the Garden of Eden, is an archaic name of the country watered by the Euphrates and its many tributaries, from Asia, Armena to the Erythraian Sea. In the Chaldean Book of Numbers, its location is designated in numerals, and in the cipher Rosicrucian manuscript, left by Count St. Germain is fully described in detail. In the Assyrian tablets it is rendered as gan-dunyas. " Behold," say Elohim of Genesis, " the man is becoming as one of us" the Elohim may be accepted in one sense for Gods or powers, and taken in another one for the Aleim, or priest; the hyrophants initiated into the good and the evil of this world; for there was a college of priest called the Aliem. Instead of becoming a neophyte, and gradually obtaining his esoteric knowledge through a regular initiation, an Adam, or man, uses his faculties of intuition, and prompted by the serpent, woman and Matter, tastes of the tree of knowledge the esoteric or secret doctrine unlawfully. The priest of Hercules, or melkarth, the " Lord " of Eden, all wore coats of skin." The Text says: " And Java Aleim, made for Adam and his wife "Chitonuth." The first Hebrew word, chitun, is the Greek, chiton. It becomes Slavonic word by adoption from the Bible, and means coat, an upper garment. Though containing the same substratum of esoteric truth as every early cosmogony, the Hebrew Scripture wears on its face the marks of its double origin. Its Genesis is purely reminiscence of the Babylonian captivity.
In conclusion, to have an accurate view of events as detailed as the demands and rigor that the scientific community expects, is unrealistic. And realistically, never have been met! One cannot progress on such choke-hold, submit to so much unnatural requirements and expect oxygen to come out. To admit to a set of scientific rules made of political and moral laws, is an obstacle in the growth of science and jeopardizes the future of new technology. The road of science, more and more, if no solution is attained in the community, will make science more irrational and unadaptable to newer and faster discoveries. For example, the ongoing problem with the politics of archeology. In this case lets talk about the accuracy of [time], the age of the Sphix in Giza has been a topic of debate for decades. All rooted because the date on the Bible happens to match the date scientists found through radioisotope carbon - 14. There are many reason why carbon dating is inaccurate that I can mention here but is long and complicated, the main reason is that, for carbon-14 dating to be accurate, the concentrations of carbon-14 and carbon-12 must have remained constant in the atmosphere and that is an impossibility. Nonetheless, the Egyptians according by the glyphs found in the pyramids on Giza and given all the data gathered, and according to the possition of the stars, their time seems that it is correct. They time it thirty eight thousand years ante christum.
Also, given new erosion test by john Antony West and his team of scientists whom corroborated aproximately to the date calculated from the walls in the pyramids. And lets face it, Egypt is the first semblance of a super advance civilization and no matter how hard it is for us to admitted, their technology in every sense of the word was greatly superior and way far in advance than ours. My question is, giving the inacuracies and gaps from antiquity, in its timely chronoly certified by our so called archeologists, what is to stop different factions of scientific groups, scholastic communities, and other NPOs to fill in the immense gaps left by history and close the windows of truth in the name of interest and power?
Unfortunately, in this case, the handle of power does not lie in the hand of truth.

Monday, January 5, 2009

THE BEGINNING


A Civilization That Never has Been Decoded or Understood


Egypt has been the fascination of a myriad of philosophers, scholars, conquerors, scientist , and mathematicians as long as we can remember perlustrading in history. All scholars that have had the opportunity to admire the depth of its mysteries, can only be perplex at the majesty of its craftsmanship, the grandeur of its size, and the tergiversation and complexity of its polyhedral geometry. Most archeologist who have dedicated their life to the study - solely - of the great pyramids of Giza, situated on the Giza plateau, near modern day Cairo, on the West bank of the Nile, have succumbed in their search for the simple truth and in a sense had turned to amorphous conclusions that to put it mildly lack credibility on part of the community of archeologists, the theological societies, " the scientific community," and the populous. It seems that the leisure of big offices and secure tenure has turned into a deep, historic  decline of the truth, crippling the most important tool that we have in the scientific field - investigation. This can also be majestically, a degradation of fact through the means of scientific proof, mutating the shapeless, odorless, collorless and unemotional  principle of truth with a quasi-verisimilitude version of it, nullifying the cardinal parallel theories from, passionate and dedicated scientist and ancient adepts, who have shown us, over and over, with countless evidence presented right before our eyes, the truth in a factual form but unfortunately had been rained constantly, with showers of contradiction and disparity by a few in power, who's purpose is not truth but personal gratification. And this evidence could be the Ficinu's "materia prima" of truth needed to ascertain an insight to a completley unknown civilization with a higher knowledge and technical superiority than our modern counterparts. The answer to how and when humanity, as a superior technological society, laid its first steps is an imperative piece of discovery because once we find the incontrovertible evidence, our answer should be one of humility and of serious investigation of how these knowledges were attained. In addition, a new direction in our evolving consciousness and the future molding vehicle of our latter future,depends in our ability to digest responsability. However, sitting on the throne of egosentric philosophies that trail as long as caravans in old tradition base purely in mythic tales with no scientific or impirical substance, can be concider coercive for the growth of science or similar entity (ies) who's porpuse is the persuit of truth. Why, something so destructive 'as the ignorance and gasconade - of man in power', as well as their affinity to ensconce recondite truths -so obvious!... and intently denied them in public, making a mockery of scientific principle and most importantly, keep them from the people, whom after all deserve it, isn't this concider a crime? why is this so different, if not worst? Perhaps we've submitted to much of our trust and surrender our complete responsability to a few " intelligent experts"instead of taking back that reponsability and start doing the thinking ourselfs. Ever since I can remember there has been documentaries, periodicals, magazines, articles, and books, about how the misteries of the construction of the pyramids were solved but at the end of the documentary,  I left more confused than when I started to watch it. Despite the large scad of brilliant minds, experts, and scientist with multiple doctorates that have given "their life" in the pursuit of finding at least some iota of truth behind the building, craftmanship, and the level of knowledge required just to imagine any endeavor the ancients achieved, the results of centuries of discovery about this civilization have been happily pensive. 
On another note, historical records indicate that everything that the greeks and the romans knew in the arts of science, medicine and word, was attributed to the anciant Egiptians. But thanks to the conflagration and the total loss of the written memorials of the secret knowledge of the remotest antiquity of the library of Alexandria and to the Ginus of the glorified Alexander the Great, we shall never know the facts of what was written in those
papyruses. In Numa's books, described by Livy, consisting of tritises upon natural philosophy, were found in his tomb, but they were not allowed to be made known, lest they should reveal the most secret mysteries of the state religion. The senate and the tribune of the people determined that the books themselves should be burned, which was done in public. History repetes itself: knowledge, wisdom, and truth, are very powerful allies being constantly a threat to power and a pestering occlusion of personal interests. So any shread of evidence must be destroyed, because God knows, if the people knew the truth, those in power would perished instantly. Lets not go back that far in time, in May 10, 1933 - An event unseen since the middle ages occurs as German students formerly regarded the finest in the world, gather in Berlin and other German cities to burn books with " unGerman" ideas. Books by Freud, Einstein, Thomas Mann, Jack London, H.G. Wells and many others go off on the blistering flames while the populous does the Nazi salute. I'll quote the Nazy propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, as he gives a speech to the students, stating... " ... The era of extreme Jewish intellectualism is now at an end. The breakthrough of the German revolution has again clear the German path... The future German man will be not just a man of books, but a man of character. it is to this end that we want to educate you. As a young person, to already have the courage to face the pitiless glare, to overcome the fear of death, to regain respect for death - this is the task of this young generation. And thus you do well in this midnight hour to commit to the flames of evil spirits of the past. This is a strong, great and symbolic deed - a deed which should document the following for the world to know - Here the intellectual foundation of the November (Democratic) Republic is sinking to the ground but from this wreckage the phoenix of a new spirit will rise..." The speech went on and on with the accompanied of the national anthem and singing of Nazy songs. I hope people see the overt parallel of these two events and see the truth of these apocryphal posters destined to distort and destroy the very substance of which true knowledge and wisdom is made. The German-Jewish poet, Heinrich Heine, had stated, " Where books are burned, human beings are destined to be burned," however, revenge isn't going to aliviate or better yet, evolve our spirits to a better state specially if it is motivated by pure animus. The only way is to dig the truth from that burial place that it has been hidden for so long and show it without fear of death under any kind of absolute despotism. one have to be very persistent and diligent to find the little pieces missing to finish the pussle called truth. 
However, finding the little pieces with hard and diligent work, is the start of a true seeker for knowledge and wisdom. For example, regarding one of the missing pussles, in how the pyramids were build, Sir. William Mathew Flinders Petrie has been one in a few scientists, within the deep sea of endless "true seekers,"  that with suffcient dountlessness and élan to confront the world with the machinig on Giza, made remarkable discoveries, specially in the Egyptian's technology to build the pyramids. Pitrie's discovery have contributed immensely to hard facts regarding the level of technology the ancient Egyptians possessed, which contradicts all axioms purported by the archeological community, i.e.; that the pyramids were build with coper chisels and the igneous rocks were digged and subtracted from the quarry, five hundred miles from the Giza plateau, with a hundred thousand man pulling a rope.  The british archeologist in his book," The Pyramids and Temples of Giza," makes very accurate findings of the level of sophistication, engineering, craftsmanship, and design of the pyramids. Petrie pinpoints accurately, that the tools allege by the egyptologist, were insufficient. One particular observation on the Coffers: it shows indisputable marks prior to being cut, just as our modern techniques are employ by engineers to minimize error - these Egyptians were utilizing the same techniques thousand of years ago - using them as guidelines to avoid any possible error committed by the masons. Another observation was the saw marks left in the granite stones after being sliced. They are unmistakeble signals of machine saw; not only machining but specialized techniques applied to machines that leave certain trails that are incredibly similar to concave, convex and special radii, which was done without splintering the material; what's more, straight saw, and even lathes, have been recognized by Petrie. Today these marks would reflect either the difference in aggregate dimension of a wire saw, with abrazive, or side-to-side movement of the wire, or the wheel that drives the wire: the result of either of these conditions is a series of slight grooves . It is interesting to learn in Petrie's book that the feet rate and either the distance between the variation in length of the saw or the diameter of the  wheels determine the distance between the grooves, which measure approximately 0.0050 inch inside the coffer of the King's chamber. Outside the pyramids are the tubular drillings, also very interesting, because they are the most outstanding and conclusive piece of evidence yet presented to indicate the level of knowledge and superior technology prior or at least in that particular epoch in history. The reason is very peculiar because it pertains to a modern specialized technique called Trepanning, which is left indubitably in the stone. The technique leaves a central core and is an efficient way of hole making and it was evident in the core cast left aside by the masons who oviously had done the technique. " There was a spiraling groove on a core taken out of a hole drilled into a piece of granite which sank 0.100 inch in the circumference of 6 inch, or 1 in 60, a rate of ploughing out the quartz and feltspar," which is astonishing, says Petrie. By Petrie's calculation on the 90 inch grooves left imprinted on the igneous rock cut by the granite jeweled tipped, the approximation of the diameter of the saw was 9 feet - that is astonishing - in modern day machining a 9 feet in diameter saw is unheard-off. 
In conclusion, despite the assumption made by the archeological community regarding, first and foremost, the age of the pyramids, secondly, the building of the pyramids from which can be observed from the moon, the purpose of the King's chamber, and all the perplexing questions that need serious scientific answers -  one thing is clear and that is: the conclusions surmized by the community of archeologist are insufficient and poorly structured in comparison to the required protocol needed to satisfied the hard demands of the scientific method. Thanks to the true and genuine scientific minds, diligent investigators, and tireless spirits like: John Anthony West, Christopher Dunn and Stephen Maher,  just to mention the few unheard-off from the popular wordly recognized " science tally," this tiny number of scientist have a broader point of view rather than the myopic standard brought upon us by the " experts." So, to surmised the process, from this particular discovery alone, the level of technology is far superior to our modern mining and machining capabilities. As a result, the innumerous and ridiculous axioms of traditional theories portrayed by Egyptologists, are contradicted and nullified, just with the monumental works of Petrie's alone. I feel that it is my duty to mention one discovery in particular that would be discussed latter, in depth, on the next article and, if, in the future new technology - rises- to be able to solidify additional proof regarding this discovery, the history of the Egyptian civilization would have to be re-written, the discovery I'm refering is the Giza Power Plant. It is an energy devised, discovered by British Engineer, Christopher Dunn in the 90's and of course dismissed by the community of archeology because it did not adhere to their traditional tenet. However, just reading the few incredible findings of superior technology of the Egyptian and given that the scientific community does not even merit the Egyptians with the discovery of the wheel, I must content that the reasons why a culture, that is so well studied for their monumental marvels and to this day - it is not known or understood - it is incomprehensible that so much effort, study and funding, is needed to keep nurturing the further investigation of a  civilization that by the standards of the community of archeologist is completely understood. I say that recapitulating the amount of investigative work surmount, known or unknown, inside or outside the scientific community, it is a contradiction in terms with the evidence unfolded publicly or behind doors and a slap in the face for the people who need to know the truth of the beginning of this -obviously - highly-intellectual and supreme technological society. But unfortunately, interest and self-preservation of power is more important than truth, scientific principle and logic. How many profound discoveries have been done by brilliant minds for the true benefit of humanity and perished when confronted by the interest inherent to power. To investigate in further detail the works of Petrie and Christopher Dunn, search their works mention above or click on the links on this blog.